The graphics and rendering behavior are little similar with PCoIP behavior, although it works in a different way and use heavily the HTML5 browser capability. Note that on the virtual desktop side it used the TCP 22443 port. Of course the web portal use the 443 port. From the packets dump it’s clear that it used only the TCP 8443 (blast) port. It’s just a 1.0 version so this kind of protocol could not replace yet the PCoIP one:īlast protocol is just PCoIP over HTML5 or it’s another protocol? It seems to be a really different protocol. Other protocols, like HP RGS (Remote Graphics Software) has been removed (from View) years ago, and protocols from other solutions (like, for example, SPICE) are not included.īut now there is also the HTML5 option (Blast protocol) included with the Horizon Suite or with the Feature Pack of Horizon View (see this post on how enable it). RDP) and some considerations on how use each protocol in a VMware View infrastructure. I’ve already write a post with the comparison between PCoIP and RDP ( PCoIP vs. This post is also available in: Italian Reading Time: 3 minutes
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |